By JIDE JEGEDE
In order to keep its people awake
to lessons embedded in happenings around them, Yoruba has a number of sayings
that inspire wisdom in caution and action. One of such is: “Iku to n pa ojugba eni, owe nla lo n pa”.
Literarily, it means “when death strikes your mate, it sends you a strong
message”. The simple logic is that you must open your heart to learn from
others’ mistakes or misfortune whenever they occur, and in whatever form. I
guess the All Progressives Congress (APC) sees
deep wisdom in this age-long Yoruba saying when it recently sought the
relief of the court to restrain the Peoples Democratic Party-led (PDP) Federal
Government from deploying soldiers to ‘monitor’ the forthcoming election in
Osun state. The August 9 scheduled for a governorship election in the youthful state
is just few days away. And the nature and levels of preparations across major
stakeholders generate palpable heat as the day inches closer. There are genuine
and potent fears that the powers-that-be might want to use their weight to
thwart the wishes of the people for the state in the election.
For a party that ‘lost’ a
governorship election in a neighbouring Ekiti state to the PDP candidate few
weeks ago, I believe it is right for the APC to be apprehensive about the
implication of heavy presence of the military for the conduct of the election.
Now in court to challenge the conduct and outcome of the Ekiti election, the
APC believes that apart from using scientific means to manipulate figures,
heavy presence of military and other security personnel across the state before
and during the election was enough intimidation to prevent the people from
voting their conscience. That was in addition to the surgical arrest made on
some leaders of the party (APC) hours before the commencement of the election,
probably to send signals to the followers that they are not really safe.
Ekiti experience came with warnings
that are too strong to ignore. Many have argued that the PDP candidate, Ayodele
Fayose, won the election fair and square. They premised their position on the
allegation that the incumbent, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, had lost popularity among its
people due to his elitist kind of governance, which, according to them, gave rising
yearnings for a change. True or otherwise, we must appreciate the simple fact
that the functions set out for the military by the Nigerian constitution in a
democracy do not include election monitoring. Interestingly, there wasn’t any major
breakdown of law and order or threat to peace in any part of the state prior to
the election. Therefore, deploying the military to monitor a local election is an
aberration, to say the least. And, if that has, in any way, affected the
outcome of the election, who can blame the APC for acting to prevent similar
occurrence in Osun state? It is a case of “iku
to n pa ojugba eni…”
Ekiti and Osun have similar
history as far as the current political dispensation in Nigeria is concerned. Like
all the states in the Southwest, they have always remained in hot contest
between the PDP and the APC (including all its stages of metamorphosis). But,
unlike others, they have the peculiar fate of being ceded to the APC (then ACN)
through judicial pronouncements which declared the hitherto PDP occupants as
usurpers. At every stage of these political maneuverings, the PDP often seems
to have the upper hand with the use of the federal might where it has been in
control since 1999 when Nigeria began the current democratic experiment.
If the PDP candidate was declared
winner to dislodge the APC candidate from power in a heavily militarized and
highly controversial Ekiti election, you can’t really blame the latter for
pre-empting a similar scenario in Osun weeks after the Ekiti experience. Iku to n pa ojugba eni…..
Many Nigerians, including those instrumental
to regaining the mandate of the incumbent APC governors in Ekiti and Osun states,
have criticized the party for challenging the result of the Ekiti election. I
have heard a lot of people argue that despite the heavy presence of the
military and other security personnel to ‘monitor’ the election, the result, as
announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), was true reflection
of the wishes of the people of the state. They said the security people never
disturbed anyone from exercising his/her right to choose among the contenders.
To be candid, I was not in Ekiti
to observe the election, so there wouldn’t be any basis for me to say
categorically whether the claims were genuine or not. Yet, native intelligence
tells me that it will be foolhardy for anyone to rationalize the provision of such
high number of security personnel by the Federal Government, also a contender
through its party (PDP), in the Ekiti election, as merely a move to maintain
law and order. Then, we need to ask too,
why did fellow APC governors and several other party leaders were barred from
entering Ekiti to show their solidarity to their brother Governor Fayemi? Why were
there no reports of incidents in which high-ranking PDP leaders from other
states were prevented from entering Ekiti for the election?
We must not forget that both the Federal
Ministry of Defense and that of Police Affairs are directly superintended by
PDP members from the Southwest. And the party never hides its resolve
(sometimes desperation) to take control of the entire region. So, if all seemed
calm during the last Ekiti election, it might only be on the face value. We do
not know how many strategies were woven up to ensure a ‘recapture’ of Ekiti and
other Southwest states. We do not know what stage the PDP was when it ‘secured
the victory’. So, if it ‘worked’ in Ekiti, it would only take a foolish Osun to
fold its arms and brag, ‘it can’t work here’ when elections in the two states are
only separated by weeks. Iku to n pa
ojugba eni…..
I sincerely wish that the court prevails
on the PDP-led Federal Government and prevent it from further abuse of the
military in local elections. At least, that will reduce the number of evils the
people will have to confront in choosing their leaders in democratic atmosphere.
But, wishes are not horses. So, the poor don’t ride. Whichever way the court
decides, we must all abide.
Meanwhile, I like to challenge
the PDP as a party, and its leaders as individuals, to also open their hearts
to accept the great lessons contained in their attempt to muffle the opposition
across the country. Death, as represented in the Yoruba saying mentioned in
this piece, can take any form. It can be natural. It could be caused through
external force. Whichever way, it comes with strong message. But, it takes a truthful
heart to grab, digest and act appropriately. If, as a mortal, you cause the
death of fellow human being, that action sends you a message if only you are
wise enough to grab it!
The PDP must realize that it has
access to the military and other security apparatuses of the country today
because it holds the power at the center where orders are given top-down. With
this at their beck and call, they can afford to use same to bully their mates
(opposition) and cow them to submission in the game of power. But, who knows
what tomorrow holds? We have examples of yesteryears powerful people around us.
When they were in power, their words were laws. But, now, they are powerless;
many at the mercy of their former most junior subordinates. Those who wield power
today, and inflict all sorts of hardship on the people must be wise enough to
grab the message contained in their actions. Power is transient! One day, they
would come to that other side where they would be at the receiving end,
probably to experience same measure of impact (or worse) as they tackle the new
powerful being. Iku to n pa ojugba eni…
0 comments:
Post a Comment